 |
||
|
current |
2005-03-02 - 6:31 p.m. i agree, since when did all this crew stuff get so intense? I thought it was just a fun nick name for our group of friends. And no offence, but the whole resigning thing, AND the responses, have all seemed a little mellow dramatic. I mean sure, everyone's erred. To the resigner, i'm sorry but every one in the crew is not a mind reader. deffinatly not perfect, but when you won't talk at gatherings or are always hanging out with the jocks, god bless their souls, it makes it a little hard to keep in touch. when your feeling bad, sometimes you have to let people know, and i know everyone wants people to instincivly know, but that doesn't always happen. i see where you're coming from, but i don't really understand the approach. to my fellow crew mates, yes maybe we are a little selfish. I agree that the whole response to this has mainly been an attack directed at one person, and we really don't need to behave that way. If it makes you angry, than say something to the person, don't rant to a nameless somebody on a damn blog. and finally, i think this whole thing is rather stupid. I think we have been using the blog way to much as a ranting venue, which is all fine and dandy, but it's really a lame place to try and figure out conflict. i hope we can finish this whole thing up. i miss entries about leaves and talks about ... other stuff. oh and one more thing, the tristan meeting was supposed to be three people watching movies at my house, and it just blew up into more. It was fun but my mom wasn't too pleased. and you really should put weekend crew for life in the year book, because if you think that one arguement could really make the crew turn on you, you don't know us as well as i thought you did. THINK about all the arguements we have had. I can deffinatly remember hating some people before they joined the crew, and that hasn't stopped me from being friends with them now. So one little disagreement is not the end. |
